Ooooooh, Isn't This Amazing...

Photo #1

Hey, it's not every day you get to photograph "Belle" from the Disney On Ice Production of "Rockin' Ever After". I have to tell you, I've never fallen for a cartoon character as hard as I fell for her, with the possible exception of Princess Aurora from Sleeping Beauty. But I digress.

Photo #2

To promote this Disney Extravaganza, actors from the show came to a local shopping center to meet and greet a crowd of young admirers, and I, ever obliging, went there to make a photo or two for the Journal. As usual, parents brought their kids to be photographed with these superstars of the preschool set, and the event handlers, dressed in black, kept the lines moving "in a most delightful way".

Photo #3

I know this is not the most creative shot I've ever made, but it occurred to me that I could have used this shot because nobody is recognizable. As shot, the image in the iPhone is too small, but had I a longer lens, it might have worked. I going to file this shot away as a possible solution when I can't get any names. Perhaps it would have worked if I had moved more to the left and had a longer lens. Oh well.

Photo #4

Most of the shots would not be submitted to the Journal, so I shot mostly for fun. I think of this as "Catch and Release" shooting, photography done "just for the fun of it." And since I don't use names in the blog, specific subjects have a reasonably safe level of web anonymity.

Photo #5

It's fun to watch how children react to cartoon characters who have come to life. And while the  fear of clowns is well documented, one has to stop and think about what goes through a child's mind when he or she encounters a gigantic, unblinking humanoid such as our friend Mickey. Without the benefit of facial expressions, there are no visual cues as to how such an encounter should be framed.

Photo #6

These young sisters don't seem to know just what to make of Mickey. I suspect that they knew somebody was inside the Mickey Head, and if they looked hard enough, they might just get a glimpse of who it was.

Photo #7

Photo #8

This young man gets a "high five" from the Big Guy himself. No shortage of self confidence here.

Photo #9

 "Belle", was easier for most children to respond to. This young lady brought her coloring book, and asked Belle to sign it.

Photo #10

I spent a little more than an hour photographing the event and ended up with a few shots suitable for publication. Working fast in close quarters is a skill worth developing. It's also entertaining, especially when you're surrounded by little fanboys, and little fangirls.

For Those Technically Inclined: 1/250 of a second, F 4.0, ISO 1600, flash white balance. Lighting was primarily from an overhead skylight, with a slight contribution from some incandescent accent lights. An on-camera SB-800 with its diffusion dome was mounted on each of my two working cameras. The power was set to 1/32, just enough to produce a catch light. TTL metering is problematic when the ISO goes above 800, so the tiny bit of light doesn't actually fill the shadows. It just gives a tiny bit of twinkle to the eyes.

Selecting the photo for submission became a game of inches. 

• Photo #1: Who is that Pretty Girl with the child?
• Photo #2: The photo says "Disney", but nothing "says" Disney.
• Photo #3: Maybe next time. Not enough detail in the cell phone.
• Photo #4: Couldn't find the child after the photo was taken.
• Photo #5: Ditto.
• Photo #6: Nice Mickey, but Little Girl #2 seems to be looking at his hands.
• Photo #7: Good eye contact, but not enough Mickey showing.
• Photo #8: Good Mickey, good child expression. Fairly close to following the Rule of Thirds. This is the photo I submitted.
• Photo #9: Pretty Girl with child. Belle isn't as easily recognizable as Mickey.
• Photo #10: Pretty Girl with Pretty Girl signing book. Again, Belle not as recognizable as Mickey.Also, Belle is too close to the right edge, the result of poor framing when the shot was made. 

Photo #11

As a post script, Photo #8 was returned with a request: Is there a shot that shows more Mickey? Since my submission was cropped, I re-submitted the image as it came from the camera. Photo #11 shows the smiling Disney handler looking directly at my young subject. While it decreased the size of my subject, his smile carried the day. The new iteration caught the eye of the Editor In Chief, who bumped it up to Page 2.

Good call, Susan!

In The Shadow Of The Fuji: The Nikon Cool Pix A

The Nikon Coolpix A: 2014 is the lunar year of the Horse. It is also the year of the Fuji X100s. A mini exodus is occurring, as many professional photographers are leaving the tried and true digital single lens reflex cameras in favor of the new breed of interchangeable lens compact cameras. While I will continue to stay with my "old school" DSLR kit, one might surmise that its days are numbered. Cut To The Chase: Click here to read Ken Rockwell's review of the Fuji. Read David Hobby's evaluation here. Read Zack Arias' review here.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/fuji/x100s.htm

The popularity of the Fuji may be due, in part, to the overall decline in sales of the digital point-and-shoot compact camera. Cell phone cameras have essentially absorbed that market, forcing some manufacturers to completely rethink their product line. In short, a camera had better out-perform a cell phone if an average user is to justify carrying another digital gadget. To bring a measurable up-tick in performance, many manufacturers are offering compact cameras with APS sized sensors, no small feat considering the potential heat buildup of this larger chip in the small confines of a compact camera. The aforementioned Fuji X100s is the undisputed champion of the breed, and Nikon's offering, the Coolpix A, was an attempt to give the Fuji some serious competition. Retailing at almost $1,100, the purchase of this new Nikon was almost impossible to justify until I found a used one for about half the new price. I hoped the "A" would make a suitable backup camera due to its resolution edge over my P7700. I felt that the larger sensor and higher pixel count were bound to produce better images. I hoped this would allow me experience some of the Fuji's magic while staying in the Nikon family of equipment. 

Pixel Peeping: Don't look at this photo as anything more that a photo taken in the restaurant that serves as my second office. White balance: Who knows? The mixture of window light, indoor incandescent lights, and who knows what else make for a strange color combination. As for post production, I took a white balance reading on the small sign with the cow near the image center. (1/4 second, F 8.0, ISO 400, camera resting on the counter).

This image (below) was cropped to eliminate everything but the sign. I was impressed by how clean the image was. So far as image quality is concerned, I'm very pleased. Had I known this would wind up on the blog, I'd have set the white balance to "Auto" and let the camera do the heavy lifting.

Here are some of the features I consider cool.

(++) APS Sensor: Image Quality? 16.2 mega pixels on an APS-sized sensor give the A the edge over the smaller sensored P7700. So far, the images look pretty good, closer to what I would have expected from my D7000. I haven't had the courage to take it on an assignment, let alone trust it as my "one and only" when the chips are down. 


(++) Speedlight Synchronization Speed: The Coolpix A synchronizes at 1/2000 of a second, but with exposure clipping when a shoe-mounted SB-800 is set to full-power in the manual mode. When backed off to 1/4 power output, clipping isn't noticeable.

Dashboard  Composite Image

(+) The Dashboard: I will give props to the A for having ready access to frequently used adjustments. Unlike the DSLRs I usually use, these controls are arranged in a dashboard, very much like the one I first encountered on my  the Nikon D40. I didn't care for the arrangement because it replaced the more convenient (to me) Control Panel on the top plate of the camera. All the necessary controls are here, and easy to adjust now that I'm getting used to it. The large 3" monitor makes the adjustment settings easy to read.

(+) Fixed Focal Length Lens: While a 35mm equivalent seems to be the "in" lens to have, the A's 28mm equivalent lens sees the world from a slightly wider perspective. My earlier experiment with a 20mm 2.8 (30mm equivalent focal length) made me conclude that I need a little more spread, so the this lens is a little closer to what I had in mind.

(+) 1.5 Aspect Ratio: Unlike the P7700, the aspect ratio of the A is identical to that of my DSLR cameras. Since I started submitting images to the Journal, I now prefer this to the 1.25 ratio associated with the 8X10 print. This gives the picture editors a little more real estate to work with should the published image require some minor cropping.

Now for the not so cool...

(-) Auto Focus Speed: Not so fast. I knew this coming into the game, and it is slow in low light. But it does have a usable manual focus option, and I might consider using it when the AF mechanism doesn't cut it. Again, this is primarily a sunlight camera, so I give the AF system a pass.

(-) Strange Behavior With Non-Nikon Flashes: There is one modest annoyance. When set to Manual, the LCD Monitor "darkens" as soon as focus has been locked. Nikon called this "M(anual) Exposure Preview" in the P7700 manual, and in user selected option. I suspect it was meant to provide the shooter with a preview of how the final image when appear if the current manual settings were used. In the Coolpix A, it defaults to this Preview Mode whenever a non-Nikon flash is used. 

(--) No Built In Neutral Density Filter: This falls into the "Better have have it and not need it" category. If a person really wanted to have minimal depth of field while photographing in an environment with a sunlit background, you need some major shutter help if you're going to shoot with the lens wide open. Assuming for the moment the the "Sunny Sixteen Rule" is correct, at an ISO setting of 100 you would need a shutter/lens combination of 1/3200 of a second/F 2.8 just to match the sun's brightness. With a 2-stop ND filter (glass or virtual), I can drop my exposure to 1/800 of a second. Alas, it appears the  only way I can get to this exposure Valhalla is to purchase a filter holder/lens hood combination, an accessory I am very willing to buy "on the cheap". Incidentally, a built-in ND filter is accessible in my P7700, and even then I purchased a 40.5mm ND filter to screw into the lens.

(---) No CLS Provisions: Yikes! I didn't realize that the camera couldn't support wireless triggering of compatible Nikon speedlights. While early reviews pointed out that the built-in speedlight could not be used as a commander (the P7700 can do this), nobody noted that an accessory commander (SU-400, SB-800, SB-900, etc) couldn't be used to add this capability. A serious shortcoming and the key reason the A won't ride with me as a backup.

Uh Yah! I was a bit disappointed by the camera's shortcomings. I suspect that if the Cool Pix A gets some traction in the marketplace, there may be a revised release of the camera (Cool Pix A+?). I'm not overly optimistic, since it's too late and too expensive for a company like Nikon to invest in an updated version to compete against the aforementioned Fuji. I'm still impressed by how much technology has been packed into the P7700, and trust it to be an adequate backup for those times when carrying 2 DSLR bodies is no longer an option. I might carry my Coolpix A with a single Nikon speedlight when I'm not actually making photographs, but more as a challenge to my resourcefulness than anything else.